Current:Home > reviewsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -Mastery Money Tools
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Benjamin Ashford View
Date:2025-04-08 05:49:19
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (7771)
Related
- Meet 11-year-old skateboarder Zheng Haohao, the youngest Olympian competing in Paris
- Tiger Woods Apologizes for Handing Golfer Justin Thomas a Tampon During PGA Tournament
- Briefly banned, Pakistan's ground-breaking 'Joyland' is now a world cinema success
- Marvel's 'Moon Girl and Devil Dinosaur' is a stone cold groove
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
- The Sunday Story: The unspoken rules of hip-hop
- Nordstrom Rack Clear the Rack Sale: Score an $89 Sweater for 11, $6 Dresses, $3 Tops & More
- Spring 2023's Favorite Fashion Trend is the Denim Maxi Skirt— Shop the Looks We're Loving
- Chief beer officer for Yard House: A side gig that comes with a daily swig.
- 'Schmigadoon!' co-creator says series was onspired by a 'love affair' with musicals
Ranking
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- Denise Lajimodiere is named North Dakota's first Native American poet laureate
- The key to EGOT-ing with John Legend
- 3 new Star Wars live-action films are coming
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- Kendall Jenner and Bad Bunny Spotted at Restaurant With Justin Bieber and Hailey Bieber
- Afroman put home footage of a police raid in music videos. Now the cops are suing him
- Kendall Jenner and Bad Bunny Spotted at Restaurant With Justin Bieber and Hailey Bieber
Recommendation
Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
Pipeline sabotage is on the agenda in this action-packed eco-heist film
A daughter confronts the failures of our health care system in 'A Living Remedy'
It's a lovely day in London with the romantic 'Rye Lane'
New Orleans mayor’s former bodyguard making first court appearance after July indictment
'I Can't Save You' is a tale of a doctor's struggle to save himself, and others
'Picard' boldly goes into the history books
Michelle Rodriguez on fast cars and fiery dragons